Email to a friend

OSC Seeks Smaller Clubs to Beat Hatch Act Violators

By Neil A.G. McPhie

The federal agency charged with cracking down on government employees who unlawfully mix work and politics is asking Congress to cut federal employees a break.

With the 2012 presidential election a little more than a year away, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) recently submitted to Congress draft legislation proposing to ease the penalties for violators of the 72-year-old Hatch Act. The agency wants Congress to reform the law’s draconian penalties for government employees who engage in prohibited political activities. It also wants to loosen the prohibitions against what state and local employees cannot run for elected office.

These Hatch Act reforms are decades overdue. Even Special Counsel Carolyn Lerner said the Hatch Act’s penalties are “inflexible and sometimes unfair.” What makes the penalties so draconian is their one-size-fit-all structure.

Currently, the default penalty for Hatch Act violations is removal. Federal employee prohibitions include using one’s official authority to influence the results of elections; knowingly soliciting, accepting or receiving political contributions, except under certain circumstance; running for office in a partisan election; or soliciting or dissuading people from running in such elections. There are also prohibitions for when and where federal employees cannot engage in political activities, such as during work hours or while in official uniform or on government property.

The current law is not entirely unforgiving. It authorizes the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to reduce a penalty to at least 30 days without pay when a violation does not merit removal. A unanimous board vote is required for such penalty reductions. OSC’s proposed reforms would smash the one-size-fit-all penalty structure. Its proposed penalties include:

  • Removal;
  • reduction in grade;
  • up to a five-year debarment from federal employment;
  • suspension;
  • reprimand; or
  • up to $1,000 fine.

Federal employees need to know they are playing with fire when involving themselves in political campaign fundraising initiatives. Soliciting campaign funds while on the job is one of the most egregious Hatch Act offenses federal employees can commit. Many employees who violate this prohibition often to so by sending or forwarding e-mails from their office computers.

Between the 2005 and 2010 fiscal years, the number of new Hatch Act complaints the OSC received more than doubled, from 245 to 526, according to agency annual reports. OSC, which is responsible for investigating Hatch Act complaints and enforcing the law, filed seven disciplinary action complaints with the MSPB in the 2010 fiscal year and obtained 10 disciplinary actions against federal employees.

In the current political climate, a growing number of federal employees are allowing their passion and allegiance to particular social issues and candidates to cloud their better judgment. While their passion may be admirable, their engagement in such activities could cost them their jobs. Government employees accused of violating the Hatch Act should immediately contact a federal employment lawyer.

Neil McPhie is the Virginia managing partner for Tully Rinckey PLLC and concentrates his practice in federal sector employment and labor law. He can be reached at To schedule a meeting with any of Tully Rinckey PLLC’s federal sector employment attorneys call 703- 525-4700.


Attorney Locator

Find an attorney near you.
Click below.

Contact Us

  • Certification matters for disabled vets

    For Anthony Kuhn, a Buffalo-based partner at Tully Rinckey PLLC, helping disabled veteran business owners is a way to give back. After all, he can relate. “I’m a disabled combat veteran,” Kuhn said, adding that he’s been in the Army for …

Read All

  • Free Download: EEOC 2016 Update White Paper

    You Could Be Sharing Confidential Info and Not Even Know It Tully Rinckey’s white paper details the Equal Employment Opportunity’s (“EEOC”) nationwide change to procedure that has gone largely unnoticed. The new procedure applies to Charges filed on or after …

Read All

Read All

Read All