Article 15

Nonjudicial punishment proceedings are known by different terms among the services. In the U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force it is referred to as Article 15; in the Marine Corps it is called office hours; the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard call nonjudicial punishment mast. No matter what it is called it is a difficult and confusing time for any service member. Nonjudicial punishment in the United States military is a form of military discipline authorized by Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The receipt of nonjudicial punishment does not constitute a criminal conviction. Depending on the level from which the punishment was authorized it will be a mark on your service record temporarily or permanently. Because it is included in your service record it is a public record. A service member can be denied a commission if there is a nonjudicial punishment on record. The process for a nonjudicial punishment is governed by Part V of the Manual for Courts-Martial and by each service branch's regulations. |
Procedure A service member must be notified, prior to the nonjudicial punishment hearing, by the commander of the commander's intention to impose nonjudicial punishment, the nature of the misconduct alleged, supporting evidence and a statement of the accused's rights under the UCMJ. All service members, except those embarked or attached to a vessel, have a right to refuse nonjudicial punishment and request a court-martial. If the accused does not accept the nonjudicial punishment, the nonjudicial punishment hearing will be terminated and a decision will be made as whether to proceed with a Court-Martial. If the Service Member accepts nonjudicial punishment, the accused, or a representative (who may be anyone including a civilian attorney, an NCO, or anyone else that you wish to have on your behalf and who is willing to help you), may attend the hearing to present evidence. The commander must consider any information offered during the hearing, and must be personally convinced that the member committed misconduct before imposing punishment. The commanding officer in charge must decide that the accused committed the offense(s) by a preponderance of the evidence. |
Punishments Maximum penalties depend on the rank of the accused and that of the officer imposing punishment. |
Disciplinary Process For Officers Accused of Misconduct: If the officer imposing punishment holds General Court Martial authority, or a commanding officer of the grade O-7 or greater:
By Commanding Officers of the grades O-4 to O-6:
By Commanding Officers of the grades O-1 to O-3
By Officers in Charge
For Enlisted Members Accused of Misconduct: Field Grade officers (O-4 to O-6) may impose:
Company Grade officers (O-3 or below) and commissioned OIC may impose:
|
Appeal An appeal is available for the service member after the disposition of a nonjudicial punishment. The service member has 5 days to appeal the decision after its rendering. There are three grounds for appeal:
The appeal authority may set aside the punishment, decrease its severity, or deny the appeal, but may not increase the severity of the punishment. Knowing your rights and responsibilities can make a large difference in the outcome of any non-judicial punishment proceeding. If you are facing non-judicial punishment call one of our attorneys at the Sevice-Memebrs Law Firm at 202-787-1900. Both Greg T. Rinckey and Sam Wright Esq. have served as JAGs and are very knowledgable in the area of non-judicial punishment area and have past court-martial and Trial Defense experience. |
Tully Rinckey PLLC
Attorneys & Counselors at Law
1800 K STREET NW SUITE 1110, WASHINGTON, DC 20006. PHONE: (202) 787-1900
441 NEW KARNER ROAD, ALBANY, NY 12205. PHONE: (518) 218-7100 FAX: (518) 218-0496
® © 2008 Tully Rinckey PLLC
