Articles

Back to all articles

What to Know About OPM’s New Time-in-Grade Rules and When to Seek Legal Assistance

A new final rule issued by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) could significantly change how federal employees compete for promotions by eliminating longstanding time-in-grade restrictions for competitive service positions. Beginning January 19, 2027, qualified employees may have greater opportunities to pursue advancement based on their skills, experience, and demonstrated abilities rather than waiting to satisfy a fixed period of service in their current grade, according to OPM.

What Is OPM’s New Rule?

The new rule eliminates federal time-in-grade restrictions for competitive service General Schedule (GS) positions. Under the prior regulations, most federal employees seeking advancement to certain higher-grade positions generally were required to complete 52 weeks of service at the next lower grade before becoming eligible for promotion. The new rule removes that waiting-period requirement, allowing agencies to consider employees for advancement based on their qualifications, experience, and merit rather than solely on the amount of time spent in a particular grade.

Importantly, employees must still satisfy all applicable qualification standards, specialized experience requirements, and agency merit promotion procedures. For current and aspiring federal employees, this change could create greater opportunities for career advancement, particularly for individuals who possess significant prior military, private-sector, educational, or specialized experience that may demonstrate readiness for higher-level positions before the traditional 52-week period has elapsed.

You can contact us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week via phone at 8885294543, by e-mail at info@tullylegal.com or by clicking the button below:

What the New Rule Changes

Under the prior regulations, employees often were barred from consideration for advancement solely because they had not yet completed the required time in grade, even when they otherwise possessed the necessary qualifications and experience for the position. By removing this restriction, OPM has shifted the focus away from length of service and toward an employee’s actual ability to perform higher-level work.

As a practical matter, the new rule allows employees to compete for covered GS positions without first satisfying a specific waiting period in their current grade. OPM has stated that employees will instead be evaluated under the existing qualification standards, specialized experience requirements, educational requirements, and agency merit promotion procedures that already govern federal hiring and promotions. According to OPM, eliminating time in grade requirements does not remove qualification requirements; rather, it eliminates a calendar-based restriction that operated independently of whether an employee was qualified for the position sought.

The new rule does not require agencies to promote employees more quickly, nor does it guarantee advancement. Instead, it expands eligibility for consideration by removing a procedural barrier that previously limited who could compete for promotion opportunities. Agencies retain discretion to determine whether vacancies exist, whether funding is available, and which candidates are best qualified for selection under applicable merit promotion procedures.

How the Rule Could Impact Federal Employees

The elimination of the time-in-grade requirement may create additional opportunities for qualified federal employees to compete for higher-graded positions sooner than under the previous system. Employees with significant prior military, private-sector, educational, or specialized experience may benefit from increased flexibility as agencies place greater emphasis on qualifications and demonstrated ability rather than the amount of time spent at a particular grade level. However, employees must still satisfy applicable qualification standards and compete under agency merit promotion procedures.

Critics of the rule argue that eliminating time-in-grade requirements could increase perceptions of favoritism, allow employees to seek promotions before developing sufficient institutional knowledge, and create greater competition for available positions. OPM, however, maintains that merit system principles, qualification requirements, and merit promotion procedures continue to provide safeguards against improper personnel actions.

Ready to book your consultation? Click below to pay our consultation fee and book your meeting with an attorney today!

When Federal Employees Should Seek Legal Advice

Although the elimination of the time-in-grade requirement may create new opportunities for advancement, federal employees should consider seeking legal advice if they believe an agency has improperly denied a promotion despite their meeting the applicable qualification and eligibility requirements.

Legal guidance may also be appropriate when promotion decisions appear to be influenced by prohibited personnel practices, unlawful discrimination, retaliation, favoritism, or other improper considerations. In addition, employees who have questions about whether an agency has properly followed merit promotion procedures, applied qualification standards correctly, or otherwise complied with federal employment laws may benefit from consulting an attorney. Obtaining legal advice can help employees better understand their rights, evaluate potential claims, and determine the appropriate avenues for addressing workplace concerns.

If you have questions about your rights as a federal employee, Tully Rinckey’s team of dedicated federal employment attorneys is available to assist. Please call 8885294543 to schedule a consultation, or schedule a consultation online.

Michael C. Fallings focuses his practice on federal sector labor and employment law. Michael has extensive experience litigating cases on behalf of employees at the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and in both state and federal courts. He also has experience negotiating settlement agreements on behalf of federal employees. Michael has received numerous awards, including the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America, LawDragon 500 the Next Generation (2024-25), Lawdragon 500 Leading Civil Rights & Plaintiff Employment Lawyers (2025), National Black Lawyers Top 40 under 40, and Super Lawyers Rising Star (2023).

Featured Attorney

Recent Articles

Contact us today to schedule your consultation.

Get Started