The traditional present during the engagement period most commonly gifted is the engagement ring. The ownership status of the engagement ring is an issue that commonly arises when the engagement is cancelled. Although individuals engaged to be married typically do not contemplate worst-case scenarios, proposers should be aware of the legal consequences that might occur after gifting the engagement ring.

Engagement Rings as Conditional Property

Under New York State law, an engagement ring is not just jewelry yet considered “conditional property.” Simply put, the gift comes attached to a very specific expectation: that the wedding will occur. The engagement ring is essentially a tangible promise of marriage, and the recipient’s right to hold onto it exists only because both parties anticipate saying “I do” and officially wed.

Accordingly, when the engagement unravels and the proposer requests the engagement ring back, New York courts generally require its return. However, there are a few narrowly drawn exceptions.

Exceptions to “Conditional Property”

• Not Yet Divorced

If an individual proposing is still legally married, even if the divorce is pending, the law will not view the engagement ring as a valid conditional gift. You cannot condition a gift on a marriage that could not lawfully happen in the first place, since the other party remains legally married.

• The “True Gift” Scenario

When a marriage proposal occurs alongside another celebratory moment, such as a birthday or Christmas, the engagement ring can be viewed with a different property categorization. In those situations, courts sometimes view the engagement ring as an outright gift tied to the holiday, rather than a conditional one tied solely to marriage. If the evidence leans that way, the recipient may have the right to keep it.

Recovering the Engagement Ring

New York Civil Rights Law § 80-b provides statutory authority to recover property transferred solely because of a contemplated marriage. The statute covers engagement rings, along with other items such as money, personal property, or even real estate given for the same reason. If the wedding never materializes, the law empowers the proposer to seek the item’s return or its equivalent value.

When the former fiancée refuses to return the ring voluntarily, the next step is a formal action under New York Civil Rights Law§ 80-b, which is typically brought in New York State Supreme Court to recover the property.

Matrimonial matters can be stressful, and working with an experienced matrimonial law attorney can help make the process smoother and more successful. If you need a matrimonial law attorney, contact us and speak with an attorney today by calling 8885294543 to explore your options and protect your future.

Jillian R. Falt, Esq., an Associate in the firm’s White Plains office, handles a diverse array of family and matrimonial law matters. Her family law practice includes pre- and post-nuptial agreements, separation agreements, equitable distribution, spousal support, child support, post-judgment modifications and enforcement, family offense matters, and child custody and access. She represents clients in all aspects of settlement, litigation and the negotiation and drafting of agreements.