In The News

Back to all news

Biden’s vaccine rule draws both cheers and resistance from federal workers

As Featured On:

President Biden’s plan to require federal workers to get vaccinated or face regular testing and other restrictions has splintered groups representing large numbers of employees, raising questions about compliance as the White House attempts to arrest the spread of the coronavirus delta variant.

Some sectors of the federal workforce, including groups as disparate as law enforcement officers and postal workers, raised concerns about the requirement, sending an early signal of looming problems. The directive is expected to apply to some 4 million federal workers.

The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, which represents more than 26,000 federal officers, has blasted the idea, saying that it believes requiring vaccinations represents an infringement on civil rights.

“There will be a lot of pushback. It’s going to be an avalanche,” President Larry Cosme said, warning that many of the group’s members at the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security would be opposed.

Rather than try to force employees to get vaccinations, Cosme said, the government could offer financial or other incentives to employees who get vaccinated.

Similarly, the American Postal Workers Union said that it was opposed to required vaccinations for postal workers, saying in a statement late Wednesday that policies related to vaccination and testing must be negotiated individually with the union.

Even some traditionally left-leaning unions have also shown resistance.

The American Federation of Teachers, which represents nearly 200,000 health-care workers who could be affected by vaccination mandates in places such as California, released a statement saying that mandatory vaccinations must be part of the collective-bargaining process between unions and government leaders.

“In order for everyone to feel safe and welcome in their workplaces, vaccinations must be negotiated between employers and workers, not coerced,” said the union’s president, Randi Weingarten, typically a prominent liberal ally. “We believe strongly that everyone should get vaccinated unless they have a medical or religious exception, and that this should be a mandatory subject of negotiation for employers to keep their employees safe and build trust. But healthcare professionals are concerned that mandating vaccines outside contract negotiation will only result in more people leaving the bedside at a time when staffing levels are already low from the trauma of the past year.”

The American Federation of Government Employees and the Professional Managers Association, which represents thousands of IRS managers, said the proposal could require the government to engage in a bargaining process with its employees.

The proposal is garnering support among some unions however, such as the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, an AFL-CIO union that represents some 25,000 federal workers at agencies such as NASA and the Defense Department.

The union said it would embrace a mandate because of the safety and security it would provide to its members.

“We’re in the middle of a pandemic, over 600,000 people are dead, and we don’t want any more of our members dying,” said Paul Shearon, the union’s president.

Biden formally announced the plan Thursday, saying that it would apply to “all federal personnel” and visitors to federal buildings, marking a significant shift in the government’s steps to control the pandemic.

“Make no mistake — vaccines are the best defense,” he said. “We can do this. We just all have to do our part.”

Those who are not fully vaccinated would be required to wear a mask at work, physically distance from other employees and visitors and undergo weekly or twice-weekly testing.

The policy falls short of a strict mandate, providing options for people who still prefer to avoid vaccinations. Dan Meyer, a managing partner at the firm Tully Rinckey and an expert on federal employment law, said this nuance was an attempt to avoid an even larger and more complicated backlash.

“This is trying to split the difference,” he said. “This is trying to get to something that’s in the middle, short of get stuck or don’t get stuck. … They’re trying triangulation to make everyone happy, but I think in the end it’s going to make nobody happy.”

Many federal workers said in interviews that they supported the government’s attempts to increase vaccinations among their colleagues.

John Garrity, an installation coordinator for the Navy who has worked on ships for about 33 years, said he saw requiring vaccinations as a simple issue of safety and responsibility.

Garrity is fully vaccinated, having received his shots at Pearl Harbor in April. But he said he remains at high risk, as a 57-year-old with diabetes and with three children in his household.

He is based in Philadelphia but works all over the country — having recently done a work stint in Jacksonville, Fla. — and said he comes into contact with a couple dozen people most days on the job.

“There’s a lot of folks out there that don’t want to get vaccinated, and I think it’s time that it becomes a condition of employment — to protect everybody,” he said. “That’s why the president’s doing what he is doing. His hand is kind of being forced now.”

A worker at FCI Herlong, a medium-security prison run by the federal government in California’s Sierra Nevada mountains, said he was deeply opposed to the mandate.

The man, in his 50s, is not vaccinated and spoke on the condition of anonymity because of concerns about retaliation. He said he felt the issue was one of personal freedom.

“It ain’t about right or wrong — it’s about choice to me,” he said.

He said he would be willing to put up with testing mandates, even onerous ones, should it come to that, but said he hoped those would not cost him extra money. And having worked for the federal government for many years, he said he would not be surprised if it backed down in the face of pushback and opposition.

“I have seen the government go so hard, but once they get resistance, good old-fashioned lawsuits and wardens not wanting their names on that lawsuit, policies change like nothing,” he said. “It is what it is.”

Read More

Featured Attorney

Recent Posts

You can contact us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week via phone at 8885294543, by e-mail at or by clicking the button below:

Ready to book your consultation? Click below to pay our consultation fee and book your meeting with an attorney today!

Contact us today to schedule your consultation.

Get Started